Papuan Views of Decentralization and Local Elections – The granting of special autonomy to Papua is aimed at ending the conflict between Papua and Indonesia which has been going on for quite a long time.
With this autonomy, the people of Papua can manage and regulate the interests of their people regarding Papuan views of decentralization and local elections.
What is Special Autonomy?
The term “Special Autonomy” refers to a recognized and granted special authority that allows the Papua Province,
Including the provinces created as a result of the division of the Papua Province, to manage and regulate local community interests on their own initiative based on the aspirations and fundamental rights of the Papuan people.
Provinces in Papua that are a part of the Republic of Indonesia utilize Indonesia Raya as their national anthem and the Red and White Flag as their state flag.
Besides, they are allowed to have a regional flag and regional hymn that is not seen as emblems of sovereignty but serve as a banner of greatness and cultural representation of the grandeur of Papuan identity.
The Benefits of Special Autonomy
This Papuan autonomy has certain goals that have been addressed by the Government.
First, to support the acceleration of the implementation of special autonomy for the Province of Papua, in the context of realizing justice, Upholding the rule, respecting human rights, and accelerating economic development.
In addition, this also aims to increase the welfare and progress of the Papuan people in the framework of equality and balance with the progress of other provinces in Indonesia.
With this rule, it is hope that the feud between the people of Papua and Indonesia can be properly suppressed.
Papuan Views of Decentralization and Local Elections
The conflict that continues to occur in Papua is certainly not far from the role of the Government of Indonesia in dealing with it.
Apart from that, the views of the people of Papua on the development of government always raise certain problems, as is the case with this:
1. Determination of Conflict Solutions
The establishment of a truth commission and a human rights court, particularly those related. To the protracted conflict and the trauma endured by the community,
As well as the recognition and empowerment of the Papuan people are some of the solutions offer by Adriana Elisabeth. To the Government for ending this protracted conflict.
It is conducting discussions in Papua, one of which involves the creation of local political party.
The dialogue that the community has been engaging in for a long time is known by the Papuan people. As customary people so that Papua can use this route as a model for problem-solving.
2. Violence in Local Elections
Rizal claimed that the reasons behind the local election violence in Papua. And its characteristics demonstrate that it wasn’t motivate by dissatisfaction
With or hostility toward the organization in charge of managing the elections. But rather by an attempt to sway the PILKADA‘s procedures and outcomes.
Therefore, this violence was largely the result of tactical considerations. Such as the adoption of various techniques to excite or enflame rivals.
Every time there is a local election, there will definitely be violence that can even cause casualties in Papua. That was information related to Papuan views of decentralization and local elections.
Hopefully the Indonesian government can continue to provide appropriate justice to the people of Papua so that conflicts do not arise again.
